Podcast: One system for both Hi-Fi & Cinema? Pick the drive with the best warranty and go from there. WD Red Pro : The Pro version includes 2 years more warranty than the standard version and has a higher rotation speed. Press J to jump to the feed. I am so stoked to be building my 1st NAS. Ciao a tutti, ... volevo sapere quale HDD sia meglio abbinare tra: Seagate Iron wolf e Western Digital Red come taglio di storage penso di stare o su 4 o su 6tb cadauno ma molto dipenderà anche dal prezzo che troverò in rete. It may not display this or other websites correctly. Haunted NAS Drives keep "disappearing" after a while of being visible?! Oct 15, 2018. Comparing real-life benchmarks of the Ironwolf 4TB vs. WD RED 4TB, overall the Ironwolf is much faster.. in two weeks I lost one Seagate Ironwolf and 1 WD Red (3 years old). The No. Rozważam WD Red oraz Toshiba N300. Da der Preis ziemlich knapp aneinander ist, spielt dieser bei der Entscheidung keine Rolle. Stale przesuwamy granice w zakresie pojemności pamięci masowej, zdecydowanie wyprzedzając konkurencję. Seagate vs Western Digital HDD. I use the WD RED pro in RAID 10 for primary backup and RAID 6 for archive backup and find them very reliable with most failures out of the box or in the first 24 hour burn in period WD Red or Seagate IronWolf. Europe's busiest forums, with independent news and expert reviews, for TVs, Home Cinema, Hi-Fi, Movies, Gaming, Tech and more. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. The price/performance seem to be nearly on par across the board. - Western Digital Red or Red Pro - Seagate IronWolf - Toshiba N300. Dysk twardy Seagate IronWolf 4TB 6Gb/s SATA (ST4000VN008) - od 469,00 zł, porównanie cen w 39 sklepach. I've used WD Red's for like 99% of my units. From a price standpoint, both products are between $210 and $220, depending on your e-tailer preference. The IronWolf scored 2,969, where the WD Red 10TB managed 3,011. I have already bought two, but I may buy another after confirming that my PC supports more than two disks. Seagate are supposedly readying updated firmware for the disks too. The price/performance seem to be nearly on par across the board. ... Western Digital Red Pro 6TB... WD Red Pro WD6003FFBX 6TB. They run a full 6 degrees warmer than my WD Red in idle and know the TS251 warns of too warm drives (S.M.A.R.T). Witam Co polecacie do NAS'a w domciu? As you can see, WD Red is available up to 8 GB, whereas Seagate Ironwolf Pro provides up to 12 GB of storage. I have 2 WD Red 4TB, and now I am worried. Czy ktoś z Was ma doświadczenia z dyskami Toshiba? Join the AVForums team live on Wednesdays at 7pm UK time. Once I have redundant local storage setup, my next project will be tape backup or maybe something like AWS S3 Glacier. I currently have all three running in the same nas (regular red, not pro). The following will give you a comparison of Seagate vs Western Digital HDD, which introduces the differences on reliability, speed, capacity of the two HDD brands. I´ve just installed two Seagate Ironwolf 8TB, and I am so dissapointed with these drives. Wish I understood their practical implications. Product Comparison: Western Digital Red Pro vs Seagate IronWolf Pro. Even the author describes the variations described in his Annualized Failure Rate chart as a "... trivial increase .. well within a normal variation.". But I am thinking about buying a new NAS and I just can't choose which drive. Wychodząc naprzeciw wyjątkowym wyzwaniom związanym z rozwojem masowej pamięci danych, firma Seagate® opracowała wiodące w swojej kategorii dyski IronWolf® i IronWolf Pro o pojemności 16 TB do sieciowej pamięci masowej (NAS), aby pomóc Ci w osiąganiu założonych celów. Copyright © 2000-2021 M2N Limited E. & O.E. Check the product nu.bers against the list of smr drives they posted. Just try to stay away from SMR drives. Seagate Ironwolf o WD Red ? The hard drive is green, black, and red with the striking IronWolf logo in the middle. You must log in or register to reply here. https://www.extremetech.com/computing/309730-western-digital-comes-clean-shares-which-hard-drives-use-smr. We will be including the following drives as comparables in the NETGEAR 628x configuration: Seagate IronWolf Pro (12TB, 7,200RPM) WD Red (10TB, 5,400RPM) Toshiba N300 NAS (8TB, 7,200RPM) When you need the massive amount of storage, you can go with Seagate Ironwolf Pro as it has bigger storage capacities up to 12 GB. McIntosh MA7200 Review + TV Show & Movie Reviews & News. Location London ReflexReact Active Member. Many thanks . Based on 1,896 user benchmarks for the Seagate IronWolf (2016) and the WD Red Pro (2014), we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,015 HDDs. Do tej pory wszystkie dyski, które kupowałem to WD Red, nie mam z nimi problemów - ale może czas dać szansę innej firmie? The 7200 rpm drives use more power and the Toshiba's seem to be the loudest if those matter. Rating - 100%. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. So the plan is to buy 2 x NAS grade CMR drives. There hasn't really been any differences in performance between the 7200 and 5200 rpm drives because of cache and other limits. But will spend what's needed to do it right. This website uses the TMDb API but is not endorsed or certified by TMDb. Sep 30, 2020. I am not sure about WD now. I also ordered 32GB RAM, and a 1TB SSD for the cache drive. Prior to commenting on the other possible use-cases, one thing is clear from the above pricing matrix - if you absolutely require 18TB per disk, the WD Gold, WD Red Pro, Seagate IronWolf … It is red and black with the signature hexagon design from WD. Given all the great advice you have given over the years, I am about to buy my first "real" NAS, the Synology DS220+. 1 Home Entertainment Tech Community & Resource. I usually buy on price when there's a difference. Also: 5200RPM vs 7200RPM does it matter for this basic use case? The Seagate IronWolf series is the company's solution for NAS setups, rivaling the Western Digital Red, but with faster speeds and larger storage capacities available. That and the Ironwolf range are £30-£50 cheaper than the respective Western Digital Red and Red … Zobacz inne Dyski twarde, najtańsze i najlepsze oferty, opinie. Replacing WD RED 3TB with Seagate Ironwolf 4TB Bart. Edit:In the end it wasn't brand that swayed me, it was price. I have a wd red I got a year and a half ago and it is CMR. May 01, 2017. If anyone has a 4/6/8 TB WD Red (CMR version) or Seagate Ironwolf NAS HDD that they want to get rid of then please let me know. W ogole z WD zaskoczyl mnie tylko WD Black 4TB w pececie ktory zlapal skads 4 bad bloki. AVForums.com is owned and operated by M2N Limited, Seagate IronWolf. Pro: Alta affidabilità; Ottime prestazioni; Ridotta rumorosità e sviluppo di calore Seagate vs Western Digital HDD. The dimensions are 5.78 x 4 x 1.03 inches and it weighs 1.34 pounds. There is a difference. I appreciate the numbers. Can anyone point me towards a demonstrable advantage to one of these choices? WD Red vs Seagate Ironwolf : Before we delve into the detailed specs of each, let us clarify the basics. Wszystko cacy. All of this is a shame, because the tie in with Synology for extended monitoring of the disks could be really useful. In the following section of this review, we will test 8 Seagate IronWolf 12TB HDDs performance in both iSCSI and CIFS configurations inside a Netgear 628x (RAID6). It's going to be your basic SMB / FTP / Plex setup. My question is: should I buy WD Red or Seagate Ironwolf for the Synology? As is known to all, HDD is the main business of Seagate Technology and Western Digital Corporation. HGST perhaps? Fan is running constantly .. Room is only 17 degrees where NAS is stored- W Zyxelu mam pojedynczy WD Red 6 TB, juz chyba ze 2 lata bedzie. https://www.backblaze.com/b2/hard-drive-test-data.html. Welcome to your friendly /r/homelab, where techies and sysadmin from everywhere are welcome to share their labs, projects, builds, etc. Very noisy drives - can be heard from the neighbor room. Seagate IronWolf (12TB, 7,200 RPM) WD Red (10TB, 5,400RPM) Toshiba N300 NAS (8TB, 7,200RPM) In our throughput test measuring 4K random performance the Seagate IronWolf Pro landed second overall in iSCSI performance with 651 IOPS read (more or less tied with the non-Pro version’s 652 IOPS) and 631 IOPS write. Seagate IronWolf, 1 TB, NAS... Seagate IronWolf NAS. W poprzednim Zyxelu mialem (a wlasciwie to mam ale nie uzywam) inny WD Red 2 TB i tez zawsze pieknie. WD Red becomes less hot, though, and uses less power. I got a HPE ProLiant Microserver Gen10 AMD x3421 cheap on ebay. I'd like to save the money if the difference would be negligible. Is there a contender I missed? I have just built my first NAS from an old computer but need a second disk to get started. in two weeks I lost one Seagate Ironwolf and 1 WD Red (3 years old). Should not be very old or having any bad sectors please. There really isn't a reason to pick one over the others. But the storage bandwidth in PCMark 08 of just 15MB/s is well below the 19.3MB/s that the Seagate … WD Red. In the reviews I see lots of anecdotes praising or slagging off one or another brand, but I'm looking for actual data to guide my choice. Seagate IronWolf, WD RED, a może HGST (choć to właściwie teraz chyba WD With the amount of RAM and SSD based cache you'll be adding it doesn't really matter what HDD you use. The drives are mostly for long-term storage of music, movies and ROMs. What's the difference between their HDD products? Seagate Ironwolf 4TB not showing Ironwolf Health Dougneedshelp. Joined Jan 4, 2007 Messages 1,373 Reaction score 50 Points 51 Location Amazon. And they have special software build in. The reality is, other than certain specific models with widespread known issues, You get drives that fail and drives that last until you retire them from all brands. Przede wszystkim, dyski Seagate IronWolf są projektowane na większe obciążenie w stosunku do serii WD Red, w przypadku której jest to 120 TB rocznie. They all have the same warranty and the same/similar features. For the life of me I cannot find a good empirical reason prefer one brand over another. I have dozens of external drives and am very excited to consolidate all that data into a storage solution with some redundancy. After purchasing a WD 4TB Red EFAX drive like the one that Servethehome tested, we used our existing test rig with eight Seagate Ironwolf drives in … WD Red has a slower rotation speed than Seagate IronWolf so you can't transfer files as quickly. Powered by Xenforo, Hosted by Nimbus Hosting, Original design Critical Media Ltd. I know I need at least 10TB to start. X. IronWolf (Seagate) raczej odrzucam, ze względu na złe doświadczenia z Seagate w przeszłości. Price are somewhat the same. Turns out shucking WD branded external drives was the most cost effective way to get high-capacity NAS drives. … Seagate IronWolf (6-12 TB) Seagate IronWolf (4 TB) WD Red (8-12 TB) WD Red (4 TB) 24/7 operation: YES: RPM: 7200: 5900 ~5400: Max sustained data transfer rate: 210 MB/s: 180 MB/s: 210 MB/s: 178 MB/s: Cache: 256 MB: 64 MB: 256 MB: 64 MB: RAID support: All configurations: Enclosure: 1-8 bay: Up to 8-bay or rack mounted: Workload: 180 TB/year: MTBF: 1 million hours: Unrecoverable read … who cares if they're under warranty? Seagate ironwolf vs ironwolf pro SD. JavaScript is disabled. Looking at … Now I'm in the process of choosing what drives to fill the 4 x 3.5" bays with. Advertiser Disclosure. Does a 2% difference really matter for this use case? Tak myslę o 4TB lub 6TB w Raid Mirror. The Winner Is- A Tie

Tesina Terza Media Sul Crimine, Servizi Telegramma Online Bper Banca 2019, Discorso Indiretto Verbi, Lavori Corso Grosseto 2021, Tu Sei Il Re Dei Re Accordi, Gatti In Calore Periodo,